4.0 Article

Structural Optimization Design and Analysis of M-Type Czerny-Turner Spectrometer

Journal

LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS
Volume 59, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

SHANGHAI INST OPTICS & FINE MECHANICS, CHINESE ACAD SCIENCE
DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.1130002

Keywords

spectroscopy; spectrometer; Czerny-Turner optical system; coma; secondary diffraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we propose an anti-secondary diffraction condition for the aberration correction of an M-type Czerny-Turner spectrometer and establish an M-type coma-free Czerny-Turner spectrometer. The correctness of the theoretical analysis is verified through simulation experiments, showing that the optimized optical system has a spectral resolution better than 1 nm in the range of 200-500 nm under specific conditions.
Aiming at the problem of secondary diffraction in aberration correction of an M-type Czerny-Turner spectrometer, we propose the anti-secondary diffraction condition for this optical structure under the coma-free condition. The main factors of secondary diffraction are analyzed and deduced theoretically. Combining the anti-secondary diffraction condition with the constraint coma-free condition, we built an M-type coma-free Czerny-Turner spectrometer. In order to verify the correctness of the theoretical analysis, the Zemax OpticStudio simulation software is used for a comparative experiment. The simulation results show that there is no secondary diffraction in the M-type optical path structure meeting the constraints, but there is secondary diffraction in the M-type optical path structure that does not meet the constraints, which is consistent with the theoretical analysis result. Under the condition that the incident slit width is 25 mu m and the grating engraving line density is 600 line/mm, the spectral resolution of the optical system optimized by the software is better than 1 nm in the range of 200-500 nm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available