3.8 Review

A Systematic Review of Horticultural Therapy's Influence on Chinese Older Adults' Psychosocial Wellbeing

Journal

GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRIC MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/23337214221093891

Keywords

nature connection; alternative therapy; healthy aging; cultural context; psychosocial wellbeing

Funding

  1. University of Edinburgh

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review examines the changes in Chinese older adults' psychosocial wellbeing after receiving horticultural therapy and evaluates the effectiveness of horticultural therapy in a Chinese setting. The findings suggest that horticultural therapy generally improves older adults' psychosocial wellbeing, but the causal relationships between improvements and horticultural therapy remain unclear.
Aim: This systematic review aims to evaluate changes in Chinese older adults' psychosocial wellbeing after receiving horticultural therapy, and examine existing evidence regarding horticultural therapy's effectiveness in a Chinese setting. Method: Intervention studies measuring relevant outcomes amongst older adults and conducted in China were identified from ASSIA, CIHAHL Plus, PsycINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science Core Collection and CNKI. Cochrane risk of bias assessment tools were used to appraise study quality. Result: 16 studies were selected, among which four were published in English and 12 in Chinese. Findings suggested that after receiving horticultural therapy, older adults' psychosocial wellbeing is generally improved, but causal relationships between improvements and horticulture therapy were less clear. Conclusion: Features of horticultural therapy conducted in China is with its cultural and social uniqueness. Existing evidence supports the post-intervention benefits on completion of horticultural therapies, but the limitations in programme design, saple representativeness and methodological robustness limited the quality of the evidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available