4.6 Article

Prediction with expert advice applied to the problem of prediction with expert advice

Journal

SYNTHESE
Volume 200, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03809-5

Keywords

Social epistemology; Machine learning; Expertise; Probability; Prediction; Policy

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1922424]
  2. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1922424] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1922424] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the novice/2-expert problem in social epistemology and the complexity of using expert judgments in policy making. It proposes that the prediction with expert advice (PWEA) framework from machine learning can address these problems effectively.
We often need to have beliefs about things on which we are not experts. Luckily, we often have access to expert judgements on such topics. But how should we form our beliefs on the basis of expert opinion when experts conflict in their judgments? This is the core of the novice/2-expert problem in social epistemology. A closely related question is important in the context of policy making: how should a policy maker use expert judgments when making policy in domains in which she is not herself an expert? This question is more complex, given the messy and strategic nature of politics. In this paper we argue that the prediction with expert advice (PWEA) framework from machine learning provides helpful tools for addressing these problems. We outline conditions under which we should expert PWEA to be helpful and those under which we should not expect these methods to perform well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available