4.6 Article

Improving the performance of milling of titanium alloys using the atomization-based cutting fluid application system

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 29-36

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.05.011

Keywords

Atomized droplets; Titanium alloy; Milling; Machining performance; Sustainability

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-CMMI-12-33944]
  2. TechSolve, Inc., Cincinnati, OH
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1233944] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research presented in this paper investigates the effectiveness of the atomization-based cutting fluid (ACF) spray system in end-milling of titanium alloy, Ti-6Al-4V. To that end, the study has been conducted in two phases. In the first phase, experiments have been carried out to select suitable spray parameters. A numerical model of the ACF spray system has also been developed to gain a physics-based understanding of the cutting fluid film formation on a rotating tool surface and its role in providing cooling and lubrication at the cutting interface. In the second phase, experiments have been conducted to compare the machinability of titanium for different cutting fluid application methods, viz., dry cutting, flood cooling and ACF spray system, on the basis of five machinability parameters, including, tool life, tool wear, cutting forces, surface roughness and chip morphology. Experimental results show that the application of the ACF spray system results in uniform tool flank wear, lower cutting forces and higher surface finish and the tool life extends up to 75% over flood cooling. Additionally, chip morphology analysis reveals that using ACF spray system leads to the formation of shorter and thinner chips, as compared to those when flood cooling is used. (C) 2016 The Society of Manufacturing Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available