4.6 Article

Food handlers as potential sources of dissemination of virulent strains of Staphylococcus aureus in the community

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 153-160

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2015.08.001

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus; Food handlers; Hands and nose carriage; Antimicrobial resistance; Enterotoxin genes

Funding

  1. National Funds Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [Pest-OE/EQB/LA0016/2013]
  2. Ana Castro [BD/39315/2007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Food handlers may constitute a reservoir of virulent strains of Staphylococcus aureus and may be vehicles of their transmission to food. One hundred and sixty-two volunteers were assessed for the presence of S. aureus on the hands and in the nose. S. aureus was isolated by routine procedures, and the isolates were tested for susceptibility against a panel of nine antimicrobial agents. The isolates were further characterized by Smal-PFGE profiling and the presence of virulence factors. Results: The prevalence of S. aureus was 19.8% in the nose and 11.1% on the hands; 6.2% of the individuals carried S. aureus both in their noses and hands, and three individuals had the same strain (PFGE type) in the nose and on the hands. Although 82% of the isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic, none demonstrated the presence of either mecA gene or resistance to oxacillin (none identified as MRSA). Sixty-eight percent of the isolates from the nose and hands possessed enterotoxin genes. This study revealed a high prevalence of antibiotic resistance and virulence determinants among the isolates, including not only classical and novel enterotoxin genes but also major virulence factors such as tst. Potential dissemination of these strains in the community is a matter of concern. (C) 2015 King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. Published by Elsevier Limited. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available