4.7 Article

Decoding polymer self-dynamics using a two-step approach

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.014502

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) , Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Early Career Research Program [KC0402010, DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC05-00OR22725]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The analysis of space-time density-density correlation functions of polymers is complicated by the intrachain averaging of distinct self-dynamics of different segments. This study shows that the averaging process conceals critical dynamical information and contributes to the observed nonGaussian dynamics. A more nuanced approach to polymer self-dynamics is required.
The self-correlation function and corresponding self-intermediate scattering function in Fourier space are important quantities for describing the molecular motions of liquids. This work draws attention to a largely overlooked issue concerning the analysis of these space-time density-density correlation functions of polymers. We show that the interpretation of non-Gaussian behavior of polymers is generally complicated by intrachain averaging of distinct self-dynamics of different segments. By the very nature of the mathematics involved, the averaging process not only conceals critical dynamical information, but also contributes to the observed nonGaussian dynamics. To fully expose this issue and provide a thorough benchmark of polymer self-dynamics, we perform analyses of coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of linear and ring polymer melts as well as several theoretical models using a ???two-step??? approach, where interchain and intrachain averagings of segmental self-dynamics are separated. While past investigations primarily focused on the average behavior, our results indicate that a more nuanced approach to polymer self-dynamics is clearly required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available