4.1 Article

Estimating forest attributes in airborne laser scanning based inventory using calibrated predictions from external models

Journal

SILVA FENNICA
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

FINNISH SOC FOREST SCIENCE-NATURAL RESOURCES INST FINLAND
DOI: 10.14214/sf.10695

Keywords

area-based approach; calibration; forest inventory; LiDAR; spatial transferability; temporal transferability

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwegian Forestry Research and Development Fund
  2. Norwegian Forest Trust Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed and compared the performance of three different calibration approaches for externally predictive models in terms of time and space. The results showed that local calibration reduced prediction errors and approaches based on observed prediction errors on local field plots were better than using reparametrized models.
Forest management inventories assisted by airborne laser scanner data rely on predictive models traditionally constructed and applied based on data from the same area of interest. However, forest attributes can also be predicted using models constructed with data external to where the model is applied, both temporal and geographically. When external models are used, many factors influence the predictions??? accuracy and may cause systematic errors. In this study, volume, stem number, and dominant height were estimated using external model predictions calibrated using a reduced number of up-to-date local field plots or using predictions from reparametrized models. We assessed and compared the performance of three different calibration approaches for both temporally and spatially external models. Each of the three approaches was applied with different numbers of calibration plots in a simulation, and the accuracy was assessed using independent validation data. The primary findings were that local calibration reduced the relative mean differ-ence in 89% of the cases, and the relative root mean squared error in 56% of the cases. Differences between application of temporally or spatially external models were minor, and when the number of local plots was small, calibration approaches based on the observed prediction errors on the up-to-date local field plots were better than using the reparametrized models. The results showed that the estimates resulting from calibrating external models with 20 plots were at the same level of accuracy as those resulting from a new inventory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available