4.3 Article

Structure of nanocrystalline calcium silicate hydrates: insights from X-ray diffraction, synchrotron X-ray absorption and nuclear magnetic resonance

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 771-783

Publisher

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S1600576716003885

Keywords

calcium silicate hydrates; C-S-H; X-ray diffraction; Si-29 NMR; synchrotron X-ray absorption

Funding

  1. French national research agency (Agence Nationale de la Recherche - ANR) [ANR-14-CE01-0006]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE01-0006] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H04222] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structure of nanocrystalline calcium silicate hydrates (C-S-H) having Ca/Si ratios ranging between 0.57 +/- 0.05 and 1.47 +/- 0.04 was studied using an electron probe micro-analyser, powder X-ray diffraction, 29 Si magic angle spinning NMR, and Fourier-transform infrared and synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopies. All samples can be described as nanocrystalline and defective tobermorite. At low Ca/Si ratio, the Si chains are defect free and the Si Q(3) and Q(2) environments account, respectively, for up to 40.2 +/- 1.5% and 55.6 +/- 3.0% of the total Si, with part of the Q(3) Si being attributable to remnants of the synthesis reactant. As the Ca/Si ratio increases up to 0.87 +/- 0.02, the Si Q(3) environment decreases down to 0 and is preferentially replaced by the Q(2) environment, which reaches 87.9 +/- 2.0%. At higher ratios, Q(2) decreases down to 32.0 +/- 7.6% for Ca/Si = 1.38 +/- 0.03 and is replaced by the Q(1) environment, which peaks at 68.1 +/- 3.8%. The combination of X-ray diffraction and NMR allowed capturing the depolymerization of Si chains as well as a two-step variation in the layer-to-layer distance. This latter first increases from similar to 11.3 angstrom (for samples having a Ca/Si ratio

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available