4.7 Article

Development and Application of Global Health Events-Mental Stress Scale for Assessment of Medical Staff?s Acute Mental Stress Responses

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 1809-1821

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD

Keywords

IES-R; global health events; mental stress scale; medical workers; mental disorders; mental stress responses

Funding

  1. Nursing Department of Shantou Central Hospital
  2. Shantou Science and Technology Plan Medical and Health Category Project [Shan-Fu-Ke [2020] 23-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes the Global Health Events-Mental Stress Scale (GHE-MSS) as a tool for assessing acute and chronic mental stress responses of medical workers in public health events. The scale has shown promising reliability and validity, making it suitable for evaluating and screening mental stress-related disorders.
Background: Medical workers have been increasingly involved in emergent public health events, which can lead to severe stress. However, no standardized, officially recognized, unified tool exists for mental distress measurement in medical workers who experienced the public health events. Purpose: In the present study, we propose the Global Health Events-Mental Stress Scale (GHE-MSS), as a revised version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revision (IES-R), for assessment of medical workers' acute mental stress responses within one month and their chronic mental stress responses within six months after major health events. Patients and methods: The IES-R was slightly modified, developed, and its reliability and validity were tested using the Delphi survey, primary survey with 115 participants, formal survey with 300 participants, and clinical evaluation with 566 participants. Results: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a promising validity of the scale. The values of Cronbach's alpha coefficient, the Spearman-Brown coefficient, and the retested Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale applied for the clinical evaluation were 0.88, 0.87, and 0.98, respectively, which confirmed a good internal consistency and stability. The results of the goodness-of-fit test indicated a good adaptation of the model. A correlation analysis was conducted to assess the correlation between the GHE-MSS and the PCL-C, which had a correlation coefficient of 0.68 (P < 0.01). Conclusion: GHE-MSS can be applied with a promising reliability and validity for the assessment of the acute mental stress response of medical workers experiencing public health events. This method can also be used for the screening of mental stress-associated disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available