4.6 Article

Machine Learning and Prediction of Masked Motors With Different Materials Based on Noise Analysis

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 75708-75719

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3191433

Keywords

Machine learning; Predictive models; Permanent magnet motors; Reluctance motors; Vibrations; Training; Roads; Gradient boosting model (GBM); machine learning; motor noise prediction; time-frequency diagrams

Funding

  1. National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center of Taiwan [11111SAO01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of noise on the human body has received increasing research attention, particularly in relation to motor noise pollution in factories. To reduce the impact, masks made of different materials are used. This study aimed to predict the acoustic sound of masked motors using machine learning. The results showed that the Gradient Boost Model (GBM) had higher prediction accuracy compared to other traditional methods.
The effect of noise on the human body has attracted increasing research attention. In particular, many factories generate motor noise pollution, which exposes general workers to noise for extended periods. To solve this problem, masks made of different materials are used for reducing the noise generated by motors. In this study, we attempted to predict the acoustic sound of masked motors. We collected noise level data in decibels for different operation frequencies of motors used at National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC) and developed a machine learning model according to the characteristics of the collected data to simulate the effect of masks on the motor sound. We use the Gradient Boost Model (GBM) as the main learning method because the model is suitable for predicting noise from comparison results of the five models are very common predictive models and may performed as compare method to predict acoustic noise. The results indicated that the prediction accuracy of the GBM was considerably higher than other four traditional machine learning methods (random forests, support vector machine, gaussian processes regression model and multiple linear regression models). Moreover, we used a general multiple linear regression method as the worst method of comparison and conducted time-frequency visualization of the sound for analysis. At NSRRC, we examined the effects of three observation locations and three mask materials, namely wood, metal, and acrylic, on the sound prediction accuracy achieved with the developed model. The highest sound prediction accuracy was obtained behind the motor and under an acrylic mask.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available