4.7 Article

The Impact of Digital Screen Time on Dietary Habits and Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14142985

Keywords

lifestyle; electronic devices; diet; obesity

Funding

  1. Medical University of Lublin [DS406]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study revealed that the majority of children were exposed to screens during meals, which may increase the risk of obesity. Promoting the judicious use of digital devices and fostering healthy dietary habits associated with screen use may be an important strategy for preventing obesity.
Background: Over the last few decades, the time children spend using electronic devices has increased significantly. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of screen time on dietary behaviors and physical activity in children and adolescents. Methods: An online survey was conducted among parents of preschool and school-aged children during the COVID-19 lockdown in Poland. There were 3127 surveys used in the analysis. Results: Survey responses referred to 1662 (53%) boys and 1465 (47%) girls, with a mean age of 12.1 +/- 3.4 years. During a routine weekday, most children (71%) spent >4 h on educational activities using electronic devices, and 43% of children spent 1-2 h using devices for recreational purposes. The majority of children (89%) were exposed to screens during meals, and ate snacks between main meals (77%). There was an association between screen time and the exposure to screens during meals, and between screen time and time spent performing physical activity. Conclusions: This study revealed that the majority of children were exposed to screens during meals, which is a risk factor of obesity. The promotion of the judicious use of digital devices and healthy dietary habits associated with the use of screens may be an important component of obesity prevention strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available