4.2 Article

Coffin-Lowry Syndrome Induced by RPS6KA3 Gene Variation in China: A Case Report in Twins

Journal

MEDICINA-LITHUANIA
Volume 58, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58070958

Keywords

twins; ribosomal protein S6 kinase polypeptide 3 (RPS6KA3); Coffin-Lowry Syndrome

Funding

  1. General Scientific Research Project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education [Y201839414]
  2. Independent Design Project of National Center
  3. Multicenter Clinical Research Project of Zhejiang Province [S20A002]
  4. Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LP20H090009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports two cases of Coffin-Lowry Syndrome in identical twin brothers and investigates their causative mutations. The results show that a mutation in the RPS6KA3 gene is the causative factor for familial CLS, and this variant was detected for the first time in the Chinese population.
Background and objectives: Coffin-Lowry Syndrome (CLS), a rare neurodegenerative disorder, is mainly diagnosed based on clinical manifestations and molecular analyses. In total, about 20 cases of CLS have been reported in China. Here, we report two cases of CLS in identical twin brothers and examine their potential causative mutations. Methods: The Trio mode was used in this analysis, i.e., DNA from the proband and his parents was sequenced. Furthermore, DNA from the proband's twin brother was used for confirmation. Results: A hemizygous variation was detected in the 11th exon of the RPS6KA3 gene, c.898C>T (p.R300*) of the proband, and the same site variation was detected in his identical twin brother; however, the mutation was not detected in his parents. Conclusions: The RPS6KA3 gene mutation c.898C>T (p.R300*) is the causative factor of familial CLS. The variant detected was reported for the first time in the Chinese population. Additionally, by analyzing the previous literature, we were able to summarize the phenotypic and genetic characteristics of GLS in China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available