4.6 Review

Augmented Reality in Surgery: A Scoping Review

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12146890

Keywords

augmented reality; image guided surgery; surgery

Funding

  1. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze, Florence, Italy [2020.1515]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the application of augmented reality (AR) in medicine and identified the most widely used technical solutions. The findings indicated that AR has been extensively used in orthopedics, maxillofacial surgery, and oncology. The Microsoft HoloLens Optical Viewer was the most commonly used display method, while the marker-based method with a rigid registration was the predominant system for tracking and registration in AR.
Augmented reality (AR) is an innovative system that enhances the real world by superimposing virtual objects on reality. The aim of this study was to analyze the application of AR in medicine and which of its technical solutions are the most used. We carried out a scoping review of the articles published between 2019 and February 2022. The initial search yielded a total of 2649 articles. After applying filters, removing duplicates and screening, we included 34 articles in our analysis. The analysis of the articles highlighted that AR has been traditionally and mainly used in orthopedics in addition to maxillofacial surgery and oncology. Regarding the display application in AR, the Microsoft HoloLens Optical Viewer is the most used method. Moreover, for the tracking and registration phases, the marker-based method with a rigid registration remains the most used system. Overall, the results of this study suggested that AR is an innovative technology with numerous advantages, finding applications in several new surgery domains. Considering the available data, it is not possible to clearly identify all the fields of application and the best technologies regarding AR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available