4.7 Article

Resilient Multi-Source Integrated Navigation Method for Aerospace Vehicles Based on On-Line Evaluation of Redundant Information

Journal

AEROSPACE
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace9070333

Keywords

aerospace vehicle; resilient; on-line evaluation; integrated navigation; redundant

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673208, 62073163, 61873125, 61533008, 61533009]
  2. Foundation Research Project of Jiangsu Province (The Natural Science Fund of Jiangsu Province) [BK20181291, BK20170815, BK20170767]
  3. Aeronautic Science Foundation of China [20165552043, 20165852052]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NZ2020004, NZ2019007]
  5. advanced research project of the equipment development [30102080101]
  6. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Navigation, Guidance and Health-Management Technologies of Advanced Aerocraft (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology
  7. Jiangsu Key Laboratory Internet of Things and Control Technologies
  8. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Science and Technology on Avionics Integration Laboratory
  9. 111 Project [B20007]
  10. Shanghai Aerospace Science and Technology Innovation Fund [SAST2019-085, SAST2020-073]
  11. Introduction plan of high-end experts [G20200010142]
  12. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFA0706003]
  13. Foundation of National Key Laboratory of Rotorcraft Aeromechanics [61422202111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a resilient multi-source fusion integrated navigation method based on comprehensive information evaluation. By combining qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis, a multi-layer evaluation framework for redundant information is established, improving the reliability of the navigation system. Through quantitative analysis of redundant information and qualitative analysis of navigation output effectiveness, the fusion accuracy is enhanced. Finally, by mutual correction of multi-level information evaluation results, the system robustness is improved.
Aerospace vehicle navigation systems are equipped with multi-source redundant navigation sensors. According to the characteristics of the above navigation system configuration, building a resilient navigation framework to improve the accuracy and robustness of the navigation system has become an urgent problem to be solved. In the existing integrated navigation methods, redundant information is only used for backup. So, it cannot use the redundant navigation information to improve the accuracy of the navigation system. In this paper, a resilient multi-source fusion integrated navigation method based on comprehensive information evaluation has been proposed by combining of qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis in information theory. Firstly, this paper proposes a multi-layer evaluation framework of redundant information and carries out quantitative analysis of redundant information with the information disorder analysis theory to improve the reliability of the navigation system. Secondly, a navigation output effectiveness evaluation system has been established to analyze the output of heterogeneous navigation subsystems qualitatively to improve the fusion accuracy. Finally, through the mutual correction of multi-level information evaluation results, the error decoupling between the output parameters of heterogeneous navigation sensors has been realized to improve the robustness of the system. The experimental results show that the method proposed in this paper can adaptively allocate and adjust the weight of navigation information at all levels, realize the non-stop work of the navigation system and enhance the resilient of the navigation architecture. The navigation accuracy is improved compared with the existing multi-source fusion algorithm, which reflects the reliability and robustness of this algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available