4.6 Article

Direct transport between superconducting subgap states in a double quantum dot

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 105, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L161302

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [832645]
  2. Carlsberg Foundation
  3. Independent Research Fund Denmark, QuantERA SuperTop [NN 127900]
  4. Danish National Research Foundation
  5. Villum Foundation [25310]
  6. Sino-Danish Center
  7. Microsoft
  8. ERC [716655]
  9. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [828948]
  10. Spanish MICINN [FIS2017-84860-R]
  11. Spanish MICINN through the Maria de Maeztu Programme for Units of Excellence in RD [MDM-2014-0377]
  12. European Research Council (ERC) [716655] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  13. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [832645] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct transport between two opposing sets of YSR subgap states has been demonstrated in a double quantum dot, and the transition between the relaxation regimes has been identified.
We demonstrate direct transport between two opposing sets of Yu-Shiba-Rusinov (YSR) subgap states realized in a double quantum dot. This bound-state-to-bound-state transport relies on intrinsic quasiparticle relaxation, and the tunable gating of this quantum dot device allows us to explore also an additional relaxation mechanism based on charge transferring Andreev reflections. The transition between these two relaxation regimes is identified in the experiment as a marked gate-induced stepwise change in conductance. We present a transport calculation, including YSR bound states and multiple Andreev reflections alongside quasiparticle relaxation, due to a weak tunnel coupling to a nearby normal metal, and obtain excellent agreement with the data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available