4.2 Article

All laser cataract surgery compared to femtosecond laser phacoemulsification surgery: corneal trauma

Journal

INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 475-482

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0283-7

Keywords

Cataract surgery; Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery; Phacoemulsification; Nanosecond laser

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to evaluate corneal tissue trauma after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and phacoemulsification (femtophaco surgery) compared to FLACS and nanolaser emulsification (all laser surgery). This is a prospective nonrandomized clinical study conducted at the Ophthalmology Clinic, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Italy, involving forty-two eyes of 42 patients candidates to cataract surgery. Patients were enrolled in two groups: femtophaco surgery (group 1 with 21 eyes) and all laser surgery (group 2 with 21 eyes). Main outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity and distance corrected visual acuity, corneal endothelial cell count, and corneal thickness at the tunnel site and at the center of the cornea. Best correct visual acuity was not significantly different between the two groups. Postoperatively, a significant decrement of endothelial cell count at the center of the cornea was observed in group 1 compared with preoperative values at 90 days (p < 0.001) while t remained stable in group 2. The central corneal thickness showed a statistically significant increase for both groups that reached a maximum thickness at 7 days and then returned to presurgery levels after 90 days for group 1 and after 60 days for group 2. The tunnel corneal thickness showed a statistically significant increase for both groups that reached a maximum thickness at 7 days, which did not return to presurgery level for group 1 but did return to presurgery levels after 60 days for group 2. All laser surgery induced lower central endothelial cell loss and lower increase of corneal thickness compared to femtophaco surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available