4.6 Article

Tailoring defect-type and ligand-vacancies in Zr(iv) frameworks for CO2 photoreduction

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 10, Issue 31, Pages 16396-16402

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta04528a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22171131, 22033004]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2017YFA0303504, 2019YFC0408303]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the photocatalytic performance of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) in CO2 reduction by synthesizing UiO-66-NH2 with different types and degrees of defects. The results show that the nature and ligand vacancies of the defects play a crucial role in enhancing the photocatalytic activity. The findings suggest that tailoring the defects of MOFs can boost their photocatalytic performance.
The nature and degree of defects can fine-tune the light absorption energy (E-abs) and charge transfer energy (E-LMCT) of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which are important for photocatalytic reactions. Herein, a series of UiO-66-NH2 with missing-linker (ML)/missing-cluster (MC) defects and different degrees of ligand vacancies were synthesized and utilized to explore their photocatalytic performance of CO2 reduction. The photocatalytic CO yield of UiO-66-NH2-ML-100 with ML defects reaches 21.3 mu mol g(-1) h(-1), which is 2.2 times that of UiO-66-NH2-MC-150 with MC. Both experiments and density functional theory (DFT) calculations demonstrate that the nature of MC defects enlarges E-abs, while the ligand vacancy changes the coordination environment of Zr(iv) and lowers E-LMCT. More ligand vacancies per metal node lead to smaller E-LMCT, which is beneficial for the CO2 photoreduction reaction. This work provides a pathway to boost photocatalytic performance by tailoring the defects of MOFs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available