4.6 Article

A proposed assessment index for climate change-related risk for cultural heritage protection in Newcastle (Australia)

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages 235-248

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.09.003

Keywords

Climate change; Cultural heritage; Australia; Disaster risk reduction; Risk assessment; Index

Funding

  1. Faculty Strategic Pilot Grant of the Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment at the University of Newcastle, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Worldwide, climate change is one of the main factors exacerbating the effects of hazards or generating additional risk. Investigation is required to understand climate change-related risks for all components of human systems, including cultural heritage. Accordingly, this paper aims to present a new risk assessment index for cultural heritage, referred to as the Cultural Heritage Risk Index (CHRI). The paper applies a desk-based review of the existing literature on climate change-related risks for cultural heritage and of multi-level policy and planning documents of cultural heritage management in Australia. The paper then presents the CHRI and describes its attributes based upon the formalisation of risk as a function of hazard, exposure and vulnerability. CHRI is applied to a unique asset of cultural heritage in Newcastle (Australia), the Burwood Beach Wastewater Treatment Works (BBWTW). The paper shows that this asset has a moderate risk related to climate change, and that some interventions can be applied to decrease its vulnerability. The use of a new index such as CHRI allows creating a baseline for the exploration of the relations between climate change-related risks and cultural heritage. It can be an effective part of tools assessing climate change-related risk on cultural heritage in Australia and might aid in prioritising specific interventions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available