4.6 Article

Tsunami response behaviour during and following two local-source earthquakes in Wellington, New Zealand

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages 123-133

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.02.008

Keywords

Cook Strait; Time dilation; Wave arrival; Evacuation; Social science; Natural warning; Behavioural response

Funding

  1. Government of New Zealand
  2. Foundation for Research Science & Technology NZ S&T Postdoctoral Fellowship [MAUX0910]
  3. EQC
  4. GNS Science
  5. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [MAUX0910] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In July and August 2013, two moment magnitude 6.6 earthquakes occurred less than 80 km from the city of Wellington, New Zealand. The earthquakes were widely felt and injured over 100 people. Following the earthquakes, a survey was conducted in coastal suburbs of Wellington, one of which (Island Bay) had previously received sustained tsunami education and participated in community-based evacuation mapping. Both earthquakes were of insufficient strength and duration to meet the thresholds to prompt evacuation from coastal areas, as communicated in civil defence and emergency management messaging. As expected, the vast majority of residents did not evacuate, however, the surveys suggest that this was unrelated to the ground shaking intensity and duration, which were commonly over-estimated. Previous education is shown to have little influence on perception of potential tsunami impact, but responses showed accurate perception of safety in relation to the tsunami hazard zone. This study highlights the continuing need to actively engage with at-risk communities, both in terms of education and training around appropriate responses to natural or official tsunami warnings, and their active participation in the defining, designing and implementation of risk management practice at a community level. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available