4.7 Article

Comparative effects of different enzymatic hydrolysates of konjac glucomannan on gut flora and constipation in rats

Journal

FOOD & FUNCTION
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages 8717-8729

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2fo01144a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  2. Jiangsu Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Bureau [FY201804]
  3. Double First-rate Discipline Innovation Team [CPU2018GF05, CPU2018GY31]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of GKOS and MKOS on constipated rats and found that MKOS had a more prominent effect on species richness. They exhibited diverse modulatory effects on different genera but showed no statistical difference in defecation parameters, gastrointestinal transit, serum parameters, and mucous secretion. Overall, MKOS and GKOS had similar therapeutic effects on constipation while exerting differential regulatory function on gut microbiota in vivo.
This study aimed to compare the effects of different hydrolysates (named GKOS and MKOS) on constipated rats, which were obtained by degradation from konjac glucomannan by beta-glucanase and beta-mannanase, respectively. GKOS and MKOS were characterized and administered by gavage at 100 mg kg(-1) to constipated rats. The variation of the gut flora, content of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), defecation function, gastrointestinal motility, and intestinal mucus secretion were determined to evaluate their regulatory effects on constipation. The results revealed the more prominent augmentation of species richness in MKOS than with GKOS. They also possessed diverse modulatory effects on different genera, such as Prevotella and Parabacteroides. Unexpectedly, there was no statistical divergence between GKOS and MKOS in defecation parameters, gastrointestinal transit, serum parameters, and mucous secretion. Overall, MKOS and GKOS exhibited differential regulatory function on gut microbiota in vivo, but with nearly consistent therapeutic effects on constipation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available