4.6 Article

Reusable alcohol oxidase-nPtCu/alginate beads for highly sensitive ethanol assay in beverages

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 12, Issue 33, Pages 21309-21317

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ra02106d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Ukraine [2020.02/0100]
  2. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [0122U200211]
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine [0120U103398, 0121U109539, 0122U000874, 0121U109543]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a convenient method for ethanol assay using nanozymes as peroxidase mimetics was proposed. The results showed that this method has good accuracy and sensitivity, and can be used for quantitative analysis of ethanol in alcoholic beverages.
Nanozymes (NZs) are nanoparticles that mimic the catalytic properties of natural enzymes. The present work aimed to obtain effective peroxidase mimetics (PO-like NZs), to characterize their morphological properties, estimate the kinetic parameters of NZs and evaluate the prospects of their application in analysis of ethanol. Herein, we have proposed a convenient spectrophotometric method for ethanol assay using reusable alginate beads enriched with alcohol oxidase (AO) and nanoparticles of PtCu (nPtCu) as PO-like NZs, and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) as a chromogen. The linear range for the proposed nPtCu-AO/alginate beads/TMB-based method is from 0.01 mM to 0.15 mM with a limit of detection of 3.3 mu M ethanol. The method is used for the quantitative determination of ethanol in alcoholic beverages. The obtained results proved to be in a good correlation with the enzymatic reference method. These results highlight the potential of the nPtCu with PO-like activity in bioanalytical applications. The proposed method, being sensitive, economical and suitable for routine and microvolume formats, can be used in clinical diagnostics for the detection of ethanol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available