4.5 Article

Prevention of urinary tract infections with vitamin D supplementation 20,000IU per week for five years. Results from an RCT including 511 subjects

Journal

INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 48, Issue 11-12, Pages 823-828

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2016.1201853

Keywords

Diabetes; respiratory infection; urinary tract infection; vitamin D

Funding

  1. Novo Nordisk foundation [R195-A16126]
  2. North Norway Regional Health Authorities [6856/SFP1029-12]
  3. UiT The Arctic University of Norway
  4. Norwegian Diabetes Association
  5. Research Council of Norway [184766]
  6. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF12OC1016126] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In observational studies vitamin D deficiency is associated with increased risk of infections, whereas the effect of vitamin D supplementation in randomized controlled trials is non-conclusive. Methods: Five hundred and eleven subjects with prediabetes were randomized to vitamin D-3 (20,000IU per week) versus placebo for five years. Every sixth month, a questionnaire on respiratory tract infections (RTI) (common cold, bronchitis, influenza) and urinary tract infection (UTI) was filled in. Results: Mean baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level was 60nmol/L. Two hundred and fifty-six subjects received vitamin D and 255 placebo. One hundred and sixteen subjects in the vitamin D and 111 in the placebo group completed the five-year study. Eighteen subjects in the vitamin D group and 34 subjects in the placebo group reported UTI during the study (p<0.02), whereas no significant differences were seen for RTI. The effect on UTI was most pronounced in males. The effect of vitamin D on UTI was unrelated to baseline serum 25(OH)D level. Conclusion: Supplementation with vitamin D might prevent UTI, but confirmatory studies are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available