4.6 Review

Blockchain Enabled Digital Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 79584-79605

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3194004

Keywords

Blockchains; Digital transformation; Bibliographies; Systematics; Companies; Technological innovation; Supply chains; Blockchain; digital transformation; systematic literature review

Funding

  1. Foundation for Economic Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper conducts a systematic literature review on how blockchain enables digital transformation. The results show that blockchain is a promising technology that can offer several opportunities for companies. The paper also provides a theoretical framework for blockchain enabled digital transformation and highlights open issues for future research.
Digital transformation is an inevitable trend that impacts all industries, and blockchain is one technology that drives it along with other emerging technologies. This paper conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) on how blockchain enables digital transformation. We analyzed 41 articles to identify the current state, clarify research gaps, and highlight future research agendas. The results reveal that blockchain is a promising technology that has great potential and can offer several opportunities for various companies. Collected articles contain evidence regarding challenges and barriers, as well as potential benefits of blockchain in relation to digital transformation. We also classified the research domains where blockchain is mostly mentioned into 3 big groups. Through the detailed assessment of the chosen studies, a theoretical framework for blockchain enabled digital transformation has been developed. Finally, we highlight open issues that can be handled in future research to overcome barriers and address the challenges concerning blockchain adoption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available