Journal
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 7117-7127Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09068-9
Keywords
Magnetic resonance; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Aneurysm; Aorta
Funding
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI14/01062, PI17/00381, PI20/01727]
- Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [IJC2018-037349-I, RTC2019-007280-1, RTI2018-101193-B-I00]
- Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [PRE2018-084062]
- Spanish Society of Cardiology [SEC/FEC-INV-CLI 20/015, SEC/FEC-INV-CLI 21/030]
- Agency for Management of University and Research Grants of the Generalitat de Catalunya [2020-FI-B-00690]
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Cardiovascular Diseases (CIBERCV)
- la Caixa Foundation [LCF/BQ/PR22/11920008]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study developed a fully automatic machine learning-based pipeline for analyzing complex aortic flow dynamics from 4D flow CMR. The results showed that automatic aortic segmentation, landmark detection, and flow assessment were consistent with manual operations, indicating the feasibility of fully automatic analysis and its potential for enhancing the clinical use of 4D flow CMR.
Objective Three-dimensional (3D) time-resolved phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) allows for unparalleled quantification of blood velocity. Despite established potential in aortic diseases, the analysis is time-consuming and requires expert knowledge, hindering clinical application. The present research aimed to develop and test a fully automatic machine learning-based pipeline for aortic 4D flow CMR analysis. Methods Four hundred and four subjects were prospectively included. Ground-truth to train the algorithms was generated by experts. The cohort was divided into training (323 patients) and testing (81) sets and used to train and test a 3D nnU-Net for segmentation and a Deep Q-Network algorithm for landmark detection. In-plane (IRF) and through-plane (SFRR) rotational flow descriptors and axial and circumferential wall shear stress (WSS) were computed at ten planes covering the ascending aorta and arch. Results Automatic aortic segmentation resulted in a median Dice score (DS) of 0.949 and average symmetric surface distance of 0.839 (0.632-1.071) mm, comparable with the state of the art. Aortic landmarks were located with a precision comparable with experts in the sinotubular junction and first and third supra-aortic vessels (p = 0.513, 0.592 and 0.905, respectively) but with lower precision in the pulmonary bifurcation (p = 0.028), resulting in precise localisation of analysis planes. Automatic flow assessment showed excellent (ICC > 0.9) agreement with manual quantification of SFRR and good-to-excellent agreement (ICC > 0.75) in the measurement of IRF and axial and circumferential WSS. Conclusion Fully automatic analysis of complex aortic flow dynamics from 4D flow CMR is feasible. Its implementation could foster the clinical use of 4D flow CMR.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available