3.8 Proceedings Paper

INTRACRANIAL VESSELWALL SEGMENTATION WITH DEEP LEARNING USING A NOVEL TIERED LOSS FUNCTION TO INCORPORATE CLASS INCLUSION

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ISBI52829.2022.9761428

Keywords

Vessel wall segmentation; deep learning; morphological inclusion; boundary length regularization; level-set methods

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to develop an automated method for vessel wall segmentation on T1-weighted intracranial vessel wall magnetic resonance images, with a focus on modeling the inclusion relation between the inner and outer boundaries of the vessel wall. A novel method is proposed, which simultaneously estimates the inner and outer vessel wall boundaries using a network with a single output channel resembling the levelset function height. The method achieved promising results on a test set, outperforming a benchmark UNet model in terms of Dice similarity coefficients, Hausdorff distance, and mean surface distance.
The goal of this study is to develop an automated vessel wall segmentation method on T1-weighted intracranial vessel wall magnetic resonance images, with a focus on modeling the inclusion relation between the inner and outer boundaries of the vessel wall. We propose a novel method that estimates the inner and outer vessel wall boundaries simultaneously, using a network with a single output channel resembling the levelset function height. The network is driven by a unique tiered loss that accounts for data fidelity of the lumen and vessel wall classes and a length regularization to encourage boundary smoothness. The proposed method achieved Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) in 2D of 0.925 +/- 0.048, 0.786 +/- 0.084, Hausdorff distance (HD) of 0.286 +/- 0.436 mm, 0.345 +/- 0.419 mm, and mean surface distance (MSD) of 0.083 +/- 0.037 mm and 0.103 +/- 0.032 mm for the lumen and vessel wall, respectively, on a test set; compared favorably to a benchmark UNet model that achieved DSC 0.924 +/- 0.047, 0.794 +/- 0.082, HD 0.298 +/- 0.477 mm, 0.394 +/- 0.431 mm, and MSD 0.087 +/- 0.056 mm, 0.119 +/- 0.059 mm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available