4.7 Article

Team Zhongyong Thinking and Team Incremental and Radical Creativity

Journal

JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER ESPANA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100196

Keywords

Zhongyong thinking; team decision comprehensiveness; environmental dynamism; team incremental creativity; team radical creativity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71902012]
  2. Fundamental ResearchFunds for the Central Universities of China [YY19ZZB005]
  3. Planning Fund for Humanities and Social Sciences Research by the Ministry of Education of China [19YJA630104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the relationship between team Zhongyong thinking and team incremental and radical creativity. The findings suggest that team Zhongyong thinking has a stronger indirect relationship with team incremental creativity via team decision comprehensiveness. Moreover, environmental dynamism moderates this relationship, with a stronger indirect effect when environmental dynamism is higher. The study reveals that team Zhongyong thinking is positively related to team incremental creativity but not team radical creativity, and this relationship is moderated by environmental dynamism.
Zhongyong thinking is a cognitive thinking style that plays a pivotal role for Chinese employees and organizations, and whether it harms or benefits creativity has long been discussed. In this study, we empirically examine the relationship between team Zhongyong thinking and team incremental and radical creativity. Specifically, we propose that team Zhongyong thinking has a stronger indirect relationship with team incremental creativity than with radical creativity via team decision comprehensiveness. Furthermore, environmental dynamism moderates this indirect relationship, and team Zhongyong thinking has a stronger indirect effect on team creativity via team decision comprehensiveness when environmental dynamism is higher. Data collected from 106 teams comprising 770 subordinates and 106 supervisors in China using the survey method reveal that team Zhongyong thinking is positively related to team incremental creativity but not team radical creativity via team decision comprehensiveness. Moreover, environmental dynamism moderates the influence of team Zhongyong thinking on team incremental creativity via team decision comprehensiveness. Specifically, when environmental dynamism is higher, this influence is stronger. These findings imply that via extensive information searching and inclusive decision-making, team Zhongyong thinking can benefit team incremental creativity, especially in a changing environment, but this thinking style has no significant influence on team radical creativity. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. on behalf of Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available