3.9 Article

Boosted-SpringDTW for Comprehensive Feature Extraction of PPG Signals

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2022.3174806

Keywords

Feature extraction; Biomedical monitoring; Morphology; Parameter estimation; Physiology; Task analysis; Monitoring; Dynamic time warping; fiducial point; photoplethysmography; interbeat intervals; wearable sensors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a Boosted-SpringDTW method for feature extraction and accurate estimation of physiological parameters from physiological signals. Experimental results demonstrate that this method achieves high accuracy and stability in identifying fiducial points and estimating IBI.
Goal: To achieve high-quality comprehensive feature extraction from physiological signals that enables precise physiological parameter estimation despite evolving waveform morphologies. Methods: We propose Boosted-SpringDTW, a probabilistic framework that leverages dynamic time warping (DTW) and minimal domain-specific heuristics to simultaneously segment physiological signals and identify fiducial points that represent cardiac events. An automated dynamic template adapts to evolving waveform morphologies. We validate Boosted-SpringDTW performance with a benchmark PPG dataset whose morphologies include subject- and respiratory-induced variation. Results: Boosted-SpringDTW achieves precision, recall, and F1-scores over 0.96 for identifying fiducial points and mean absolute error values less than 11.41 milliseconds when estimating IBI. Conclusion: Boosted-SpringDTW improves F1-Scores compared to two baseline feature extraction algorithms by 35% on average for fiducial point identification and mean percent difference by 16% on average for IBI estimation. Significance: Precise hemodynamic parameter estimation with wearable devices enables continuous health monitoring throughout a patients' daily life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available