4.7 Article

On Dropsonde Surface-Adjusted Winds and Their Use for the Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer Wind Speed Calibration

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3189310

Keywords

Sea surface; Ocean temperature; Sea measurements; Wind speed; Atmospheric measurements; Calibration; Aircraft; Calibration; dropsondes; microwave radiometry; ocean surface high and extreme wind reference; tropical cyclones

Funding

  1. MCIN/AEI
  2. ERDF A way of making Europe through the Spanish Research and Development Project L-BAND [ESP2017-89463-C3-1-R]
  3. MCIN/AEI through the Project INTERACT [PID2020-114623RB-C31]
  4. Spanish Government through the Severo Ochoa Center of Excellence Accreditation [CEX2019-000928-S]
  5. European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) [16_166-STC, EUM/CO/16/4600001953]
  6. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, through the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Postdoctoral Program (NPP)
  7. NASA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the measurements of the airborne stepped frequency microwave radiometer (SFMR) with the surface-adjusted dropsonde winds derived from the WL150 algorithm. The analysis shows that the layer altitude has a significant impact on dropsonde/SFMR wind comparisons. The study suggests that the use of actual 10-m dropsonde measurements should be further investigated to improve calibration/validation for high and extreme wind conditions.
The airborne stepped frequency microwave radiometer (SFMR) provides the measurements of 10-m ocean surface wind speed in high and extreme wind conditions. These winds are calibrated using the surface-adjusted wind estimates from the so-called dropsondes. The surface-adjusted winds are obtained from layer-averaged winds scaled to 10-m altitude to eliminate the local surface variability not associated with the storm strength. The SFMR measurements and, consequently, the surface-adjusted dropsonde winds represent a possible reference for satellite instrument and model calibration/validation at high and extreme wind conditions. To this end, representativeness errors that those measurements may introduce need to be taken into account to ensure that the storm variability is correctly resolved in satellite retrievals and modeling. In this work, we compare the SFMR winds with the dropsonde surface-adjusted winds derived from the so-called WL150 algorithm, which uses the lowest 150-m layer between 10 and 350 m. We use nine years of data from 2009 to 2017. We focus on the effects of the layer altitude and thickness. Our analysis shows that the layer altitude has a significant impact on dropsonde/SFMR wind comparisons. Moreover, the averaged winds obtained from layers thinner than the nominal 150 m and closer to the surface are more representative of the SFMR surface wind speed than the WL150 speeds. We also find that the surface-adjusted winds are more representative of 10-km horizontally averaged SFMR winds. We conclude that for calibration/validation purposes, the WL150 algorithm can introduce noise, and the use of actual 10-m dropsonde measurements should be further investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available