4.8 Article

NK Cell Influence on the Outcome of Primary Epstein-Barr Virus Infection

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00323

Keywords

lytic EBV infection; NKG2D; DNAM-1; infectious mononucleosis; humanized mice

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research Switzerland [KFS-3234-08-2013]
  2. Cancer Research Zurich
  3. Worldwide Cancer Research [14-1033]
  4. University of Zurich
  5. Sobek Foundation
  6. Swiss Vaccine Research Institute
  7. SPARKS Foundation [15UOZ01]
  8. COST Mye-EUNITER of EU FP7
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_1162560, CRSII3_160708]
  10. Sparks Charity [15UOZ01] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Worldwide Cancer Research [14-1033] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The herpesvirus Epstein Barr virus (EBV) was discovered as the first human candidate tumor virus in Burkitt's lymphoma more than 50 years ago. Despite its strong growth transforming capacity, more than 90% of the human adult population carries this virus asymptomatically under near perfect immune control. The mode of primary EBV infection is in part responsible for EBV-associated diseases, including Hodgkin's lymphoma. It is, therefore, important to understand which circumstances lead to symptomatic primary EBV infection, called infectious mononucleosis (IM). Innate immune control of lytic viral replication by early -differentiated natural killer (NK) cells was found to attenuate IM symptoms and continuous loss of the respective NK cell subset during the first decade of life might predispose for IM during adolescence. In this review, we discuss the evidence that NK cells are involved in the immune control of EBV, mechanisms by which they might detect and control lytic EBV replication, and compare NK cell subpopulations that expand during different human herpesvirus infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available