4.7 Article

Clinical validation of Wave-CAIPI susceptibility-weighted imaging for routine brain MRI at 1.5 T

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 7128-7135

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08871-8

Keywords

Susceptibility-weighted imaging; Controlled Aliasing In Parallel Imaging; Brain; Magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. Harvard Catalyst \ The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health) [P41 EB015896, R01 EB020613, UL 1TR002541]
  2. Harvard University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wave-SWI showed superior performance compared to T2*w-GRE in terms of pathology visualization, signal dropout artifacts, visualization of normal anatomy, and overall image quality, and was non-inferior to standard SWI. Wave-SWI can be performed in a 1.5 T clinical setting with robust performance and preservation of diagnostic quality.
Objectives Wave-CAIPI (Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging) enables dramatic reduction in acquisition time of 3D MRI sequences such as 3D susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) but has not been clinically evaluated at 1.5 T. We sought to compare highly accelerated Wave-CAIPI SWI (Wave-SWI) with two alternative standard sequences, conventional three-dimensional SWI and two-dimensional T2*-weighted Gradient-Echo (T2*w-GRE), in patients undergoing routine brain MRI at 1.5 T. Methods In this study, 172 patients undergoing 1.5 T brain MRI were scanned with a more commonly used susceptibility sequence (standard SWI or T2*w-GRE) and a highly accelerated Wave-SWI sequence. Two radiologists blinded to the acquisition technique scored each sequence for visualization of pathology, motion and signal dropout artifacts, image noise, visualization of normal anatomy (vessels and basal ganglia mineralization), and overall diagnostic quality. Superiority testing was performed to compare Wave-SWI to T2*w-GRE, and non-inferiority testing with 15% margin was performed to compare Wave-SWI to standard SWI. Results Wave-SWI performed superior in terms of visualization of pathology, signal dropout artifacts, visualization of normal anatomy, and overall image quality when compared to T2*w-GRE (all p < 0.001). Wave-SWI was non-inferior to standard SWI for visualization of normal anatomy and pathology, signal dropout artifacts, and overall image quality (all p < 0.001). Wave-SWI was superior to standard SWI for motion artifact (p < 0.001), while both conventional susceptibility sequences were superior to Wave-SWI for image noise (p < 0.001). Conclusions Wave-SWI can be performed in a 1.5 T clinical setting with robust performance and preservation of diagnostic quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available