3.8 Article

Goodness-of-Fit and Generalized Estimating Equation Methods for Ordinal Responses Based on the Stereotype Model

Journal

STATS
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 507-520

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/stats5020030

Keywords

goodness-of-fit; longitudinal data; ordinal data; stereotype model

Funding

  1. Marsden grant [E2987-3648]
  2. GRBIO [2017 SGR 622]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Spain) [PID2019-104830RB-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents two recent advances in modeling ordinal data and emphasizes their practical significance in filling the gap in methodologies available for analyzing ordinal responses.
Background: Data with ordinal categories occur in many diverse areas, but methodologies for modeling ordinal data lag severely behind equivalent methodologies for continuous data. There are advantages to using a model specifically developed for ordinal data, such as making fewer assumptions and having greater power for inference. Methods: The ordered stereotype model (OSM) is an ordinal regression model that is more flexible than the popular proportional odds ordinal model. The primary benefit of the OSM is that it uses numeric encoding of the ordinal response categories without assuming the categories are equally-spaced. Results: This article summarizes two recent advances in the OSM: (1) three novel tests to assess goodness-of-fit; (2) a new Generalized Estimating Equations approach to estimate the model for longitudinal studies. These methods use the new spacing of the ordinal categories indicated by the estimated score parameters of the OSM. Conclusions: The recent advances presented can be applied to several fields. We illustrate their use with the well-known arthritis clinical trial dataset. These advances fill a gap in methodologies available for ordinal responses and may be useful for practitioners in many applied fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available