4.6 Article

A computational tool to accurately and quickly predict 19F NMR chemical shifts of molecules with fluorine-carbon and fluorine-boron bonds

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 24, Issue 34, Pages 20409-20425

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp02317b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/T030488/1, EP/T030534/1, EP/T030658/1, EP/T030666/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the accuracy of predicting F-19 NMR chemical shifts using density-functional-theory (DFT) based procedures and identifies the best combination of methods and basis sets. The results can be used as a tool to characterize reaction intermediates and products, and aid in determining mechanistic pathways.
We report the evaluation of density-functional-theory (DFT) based procedures for predicting F-19 NMR chemical shifts at modest computational cost for a range of molecules with fluorine bonds, to be used as a tool for assisting the characterisation of reaction intermediates and products and as an aid to identifying mechanistic pathways. The results for a balanced learning set of molecules were then checked using two further testing sets, resulting in the recommendation of the omega B97XD/aug-cc-pvdz DFT method and basis set as having the best combination of accuracy and computational time, with a RMS error of 3.57 ppm. Cationic molecules calculated without counter-anion showed normal errors, whilst anionic molecules showed somewhat larger errors. The method was applied to the prediction of the conformationally averaged F-19 chemical shifts of 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluoropentan-1-ol, in which gauche stereoelectronic effects involving fluorine dominate and to determining the position of coordination equilibria of fluorinated boranes as an aid to verifying the relative energies of intermediate species involved in catalytic amidation reactions involving boron catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available