3.8 Article

Unsatisfactory accuracy of recent robotic assisting system ROSA for total knee arthroplasty

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1186/s40634-022-00522-7

Keywords

Total knee arthroplasty; Robotic surgical assistant; Computer assisted surgery; Mechanical axis; Hip-knee-ankle angle; Clinical study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of a newly FDA-approved robotic-assisted device in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The results showed that the device accurately predicted coronal plane resections but fell short in the sagittal plane.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to quantify accuracy of a recently FDA-approved robotic-assisted device. Methods Thirty-seven patients underwent TKA with the Robotic Surgical Assistant (ROSA) by the same operating surgeon and team over the course of 3 months. Intra-operative mechanical axis measurements, composed of alpha (alpha), beta (beta), gamma (gamma), and delta (delta) angles, and the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) were calculated by the ROSA. Post-operative mechanical implant angles were taken from 36 '' stitched post-op films and measured in the PACS imaging system. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the percentage of postoperative long length films within 2 degrees and 3 degrees of the ROSA intra-operative plan. Results The ROSA system accurately calculated the HKA, alpha, and beta angles (95% CI), but was inaccurate in calculating both gamma and delta angles. Using a window of +/- 3 degrees accuracy, the HKA, alpha and beta angles were accurate at levels of 89, 100 and 92% respectively. In contrast, the sagittal relationships were considerably less accurate at 77 and 74% for the gamma and delta angles respectively. Subsequently, the proportion of cases within 2 and 3 degrees of the intra-operative plan for resection angles was considered accurate for HKA (73% within 2 degrees, 89% within 3 degrees), alpha (92% within 2 degrees, 100% within 3 degrees), and beta (76% within 2 degrees, 92% within 3 degrees) angles, but considered inaccurate for gamma (51% within 2 degrees, 77% within 3 degrees) and delta angles (57% within 2 degrees, 74% within 3 degrees). Conclusions This study demonstrated that while the ROSA system seems to accurately predict coronal plane resections in TKA, it falls short in the sagittal plane. Further research in these deficiencies can provide insight into the overall efficacy of robotic assisted surgery in TKA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available