4.6 Article

Protein-inorganic hybrid porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
Volume 10, Issue 34, Pages 6546-6556

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2tb00853j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21935002, U2032123, 21574023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduced LAPONITE(R) into regenerated silk fibroin porous scaffolds, resulting in RSF/LAP 3D porous scaffolds with good biocompatibility and biodegradability. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated the potential of RSF/LAP 3D porous scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.
Porous scaffolds hold promise in the treatment of bone defects for bone tissue engineering due to their interconnected porous structure and suitable mechanical properties. Herein, LAPONITE (R) (LAP), which is able to promote osteogenic differentiation, was introduced into regenerated silk fibroin (RSF) porous scaffolds. Due to hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions between RSF and LAP, RSF/LAP 3D porous scaffolds were successfully prepared. The pore size, porosity, and mechanical properties of the RSF/LAP 3D porous scaffolds were modulated during the preparation process. Evaluation of the proliferation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) on the RSF/LAP 3D porous scaffolds in vitro indicated that the addition of LAP improved the adhesion and proliferation of cells. Additionally, alkaline phosphatase activity and osteospecific gene expression analysis showed that the RSF/LAP 3D porous scaffolds enhanced the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs compared to the pristine RSF porous scaffolds, especially with a higher LAP content. The subcutaneous implantation of the RSF/LAP 3D porous scaffolds in rats demonstrated good histocompatibility in vivo. Therefore, RSF/LAP 3D porous scaffolds with good biocompatibility and biodegradability have good application prospects in the field of bone tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available