4.7 Article

Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions

Journal

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 358-371

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.006

Keywords

Shared values; Transcendental values; Integrated valuation; Deliberative monetary valuation; Ethics; Cultural ecosystem services

Funding

  1. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-On (Work Package 6: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values) - UK Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)
  2. Welsh Government
  3. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  4. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  5. Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)
  6. MASTS pooling initiative (The Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland) - Scottish Funding Council [HR09011]
  7. European Union [315925]
  8. Chief Scientist Office [HERU1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Valuation that focuses only on individual values evades the substantial collective and intersubjective meanings, significance and value from ecosystems. Shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems constitute a diffuse and interdisciplinary field of research, covering an area that links questions around value ontology, elicitation and aggregation with questions of participation, ethics, and social justice. Synthesising understanding from various contributions to this Special Issue of Ecosystem Services, and with a particular focus on deliberation and deliberative valuation, we discuss key findings and present 35 future research questions in eight topic areas: 1) the ontology of shared values; 2) the role of catalyst and conflict points; 3) shared values and cultural ecosystem services; 4) transcendental values; 5) the process and outcomes of deliberation; 6) deliberative monetary valuation; 7) value aggregation, meta-values and 'rules of the game'; and 8) integrating valuation methods. The results of this Special Issue and these key questions can help develop a more extensive evidence base to mature the area and develop environmental valuation into a more pluralistic, comprehensive, robust, legitimate and effective way of safeguarding ecosystems and their services for the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available