4.7 Article

The contribution of glacial isostatic adjustment to projections of sea-level change along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of North America

Journal

EARTHS FUTURE
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages 440-464

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016EF000363

Keywords

Sea-Level; Glacial Isostatic Adjustment; Projections; Numerical Modeling

Funding

  1. PAGES/INQUA
  2. Canada Research Chairs Program
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. National Science Foundation [OCE-1458904]
  5. Hurricane Sandy Coastal Resiliency Competitive Grants Program [2300.14.044017]
  6. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture
  7. Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station [5450]
  8. US Department of Energy through the National Institute for Climatic Change Research Coastal Center
  9. IGCP [639]
  10. Division Of Earth Sciences
  11. Directorate For Geosciences [1440015] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  13. Directorate For Geosciences [1458903, 1458904] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We determine the contribution of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) to future relative sea-level change for the North American coastline between Newfoundland and Texas. We infer GIA model parameters using recently compiled and quality-assessed databases of past sea-level changes, including new databases for the United States Gulf Coast and Atlantic Canada. At 13 cities along this coastline, we estimate the GIA contribution to range from a few centimeters (e.g., 3 [-1 to 9] cm Miami) to a few decimeters (e.g., 18 [12-22] cm, Halifax) for the period 2085-2100 relative to 2006-2015 (1-sigma ranges given). We provide estimates of uncertainty in the GIA component using two different methods; the more conservative approach produces total ranges (1-sigma confidence) that vary from 3 to 16cm for the cities considered. Contributions from ocean steric and dynamic changes as well as those from changes in land ice are also estimated to provide context for the GIA projections. When summing the contributions from all three processes at the 13 cities considered along this coastline, using median or best-estimate values, the GIA signal comprises 5-38% of the total depending on the adopted climate forcing and location. The contributions from ocean dynamic/steric changes and ice mass loss are similar in amplitude but with spatial variation that approximately cancels, resulting in GIA dominating the net spatial variability north of 35 degrees N.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available