4.6 Article

Low Latency Speech Enhancement for Hearing Aids Using Deep Filtering

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASLP.2022.3198548

Keywords

Speech enhancement; Signal to noise ratio; Noise reduction; Hearing aids; Noise measurement; Customer relationship management; Deep learning; Hearing aid; speech enhancement; noise reduction; deep neural network; machine learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores a deep neural network based noise reduction method for wideband spectrograms. The results show that this method outperforms traditional algorithms in non-stationary noise environments and has been validated through objective and subjective studies.
Noise reduction is an important feature supporting hearing aid (HA) users in their daily routines and is thus included in most commercially available devices. Latency requirements of HAs require short processing windows resulting in a poor frequency resolution in the whole processing chain including noise reduction. Previous studies have shown that deep neural network (DNN) based algorithms outperform conventional noise reduction algorithms especially for non-stationary noises. This study explores a DNN based noise reduction method using deep filtering targeted for wideband spectrograms given the employed HA filter bank. That is, we predict complex filter coefficients that are linearly applied to the noisy spectrum. We assess different filter sizes over time and frequency axis, and provide evidence for a superior performance over a complex ratio mask. Furthermore, we introduce a frequency response loss that operates on a per-frequency-band basis to fully utilize the deep filtering concept. We objectively demonstrate on-par performance with related state-of-the-art deep learning methods and show in a subjective user study that our method is perceptually preferred to existing HA noise reduction algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available