4.5 Article

Combining L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar backscatter and TanDEM-X canopy height for forest aboveground biomass estimation

Journal

FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/ffgc.2022.918408

Keywords

SAR; biomass; AGB; TanDEM-X; ALOS-2; PALSAR-2; radar; height; tropical

Funding

  1. German Aerospace Center
  2. Japanese Space Exploration Agency (JAXA) [NTI_POLI_6937, DEM_GLAC1805]
  3. [JAXA-1396]
  4. [JAXA-3055]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the potential of combining backscatter with polarimetric SAR interferometry (PolInSAR) estimated forest stand height for improved above-ground biomass (AGB) estimation. The results demonstrate the potential of this synergistic combination for AGB mapping over a tropical forest range in India.
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) backscatter based above-ground biomass (AGB) estimates are limited by the saturation of the backscatter-AGB curve. This work explores the potential of combining backscatter with polarimetric SAR interferometry (PolInSAR) estimated forest stand height for improved AGB estimation. The models combining L-band backscatter and TanDEM-X height are compared with established backscatter based models. The models are also temporally cross-validated, i.e., trained on one acquisition date and validated for other dates. It is observed that with the input of height, the combined models perform significantly better than backscatter based models, with an improvement in root mean square error (RMSE) between 19% and 46%. The model utilizing HV-polarized backscatter and TanDEM-X PolInSAR height provide the best case AGB inversion with an R-2 = 0.78 and an RMSE of 27.1 Mg/ha or 22% of mean AGB. The results demonstrate the potential of the synergistic combination of L-band PolSAR (backscatter) and X-band PolInSAR (height) products for AGB mapping over a tropical forest range in India.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available