4.1 Article

Single atom and defect engineering of CuO for efficient electrochemical reduction of CO2 to C2H4

Journal

SMARTMAT
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 194-205

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/smm2.1105

Keywords

CO2 reduction; copper oxide; electrocatalysis; ethylene; single sites

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21972010]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2192039]
  3. NRF Korea [NRF-2016M3D1A1021147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the synergistic electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to C2H4 at low overpotentials achieved by coupling single Sb atoms and oxygen vacancies of CuO. The highly dispersed Sb atoms greatly enhance the overall CO2 reduction efficiency and the selectivity towards C2H4.
Electrochemical CO2 transformation to high-value ethylene (C2H4) at high currents and efficiencies is desired and yet remains a grand challenge. We show for the first time that coupling single Sb atoms and oxygen vacancies of CuO enable synergistic electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to C2H4 at low overpotentials. Highly dispersed Sb atoms occupying metal substitutional sites of CuO are synthesized under mild conditions. The overall CO2 reduction faradaic efficiency (FE) reaches 89.3 +/- 1.1% with an FE toward C2H4 exceeding 58.4% at a high-current density of 500 mA/cm(2). Addition of the p-block metal is found to induce transformation of CuO from flakes to nanoribbons rich in nanoholes and oxygen vacancies, greatly enhancing CO2 adsorption and activation while suppressing hydrogen evolution. Further density functional theory calculations with in situ X-ray diffraction reveal that combining Sb sites and oxygen vacancies prominently lessen the dimerization energy of adsorbed CO intermediate, thus boosting the conversion of CO2 to produce C2H4. This study provides a new perspective for promoting selective C-C coupling for electrochemical CO2 reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available