3.8 Proceedings Paper

Fusion of multiple deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) for improved segmentation of lung nodules in CT images

Journal

Publisher

SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/12.2612360

Keywords

Computer-aided diagnosis; lung nodule; Deep learning

Funding

  1. NIH [U01CA216459]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we developed DCNN-based methods for lung nodule segmentation. Fusion methods combining different DCNNs and deep learning models were used to improve segmentation accuracy. The results showed that fusion methods utilizing SEAB and CBAM achieved better performance in segmentation.
We are developing DCNN-based methods for the segmentation of lung nodules of a wide variety of sizes, shapes, and margins. In this study, we developed several fusion methods for hybridizing multiple DCNNs with different structures to improve segmentation accuracy. Two groups of fusion methods that combined the output information from our previously designed shallow and deep U-shape based deep learning models (U-DL) were compared. Group-1 denotes the late fusion (LF) methods that concatenated the feature maps output from the last layers (before a sigmoid activation layer) of the two U-DLs. Group-2 denotes early fusion (EF) methods that combined multi-scale output information from the encoders and decoders, or decoders alone, of the two U-DLs. A set of 883 cases from the LIDC-IDRI database which contained lung nodules manually marked by at least two radiologists was selected for this study. We split the data into 683 training and validation and 200 independent test cases. The multiple DCNNs with the fusion method were trained simultaneously and end-to-end. The baseline LF-1 method using pre-defined thresholds achieved an average DICE coefficient of 0.718 +/- 0.159. The newly developed LF method using Squeeze and Excitation Attention Block (SEAB) followed by a sigmoid activation layer (LF-4), and two Convolutional Block Attention Modules (CBAM) based EF methods that combined multiscale information from the decoders alone (EF-2) or from both the encoders and decoders (EF-3) of the two U-DLs, achieved significantly (p<0.05) better performance with average DICE coefficients of 0.745 +/- 0.135, 0.745 +/- 0.142, and 0.747 +/- 0.142, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available