4.2 Article

Pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous melatonin in healthy volunteers

Journal

BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40360-016-0052-2

Keywords

Bioavailability; Intravenous; Melatonin; Oral; Pharmacokinetic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The aim was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of oral and iv melatonin in healthy volunteers. Methods: The study was performed as a cohort crossover study. The volunteers received either 10 mg oral melatonin or 10 mg intravenous melatonin on two separate study days. Blood samples were collected at different time points following oral administration and short iv infusion, respectively. Plasma melatonin concentrations were determined by RIA technique. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed by the method of residuals and compartmental analysis. The pharmacokinetic variables: k(a), t(1/2) absorption, t(max), C-max, t(1/2) elimination, AUC(0-infinity), and bioavailability were determined for oral melatonin. C-max, t(1/2) elimination, V-d, CL and AUC(0-infinity) were determined for intravenous melatonin. Results: Twelve male volunteers completed the study. Baseline melatonin plasma levels did not differ significantly between the study days (P = 0.067). Mean (SD) t(1/2 absorption) of oral melatonin was 6.0 (3.1) min. Mean t(max) was 40.8 (17.8) min with a median (IQR) C-max of 3550.5 (2500.5-8057.5) pg ml(-1). Mean t(1/2 elimination) was 53.7 (7.0) min. Median absolute bioavailability was 2.5 (1.7-4.7) %. Median C-max after short iv infusion of melatonin was 389,875.0 (174,775.0-440,362.5) pg ml(-1). Mean t(1/2 elimination) was 39.4 (3.6) min, mean V-d 1.2 (0.6) l kg(-1) and mean CL 0.0218 (0.0102) l min(-1) kg(-1). Conclusions: This cohort crossover study estimated pharmacokinetics of oral and iv melatonin, respectively in healthy volunteers. Bioavailability of oral melatonin was only 3 %.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available