4.7 Article

Experimental investigation into dynamic axial impact responses of double hat shaped CFRP tubes

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 494-504

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.016

Keywords

Carbon-carbon composites (CCCs); Impact behavior; Bladder molding; Hat shaped tube

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51205422]
  2. Pearl River Nova Program of Guangzhou [2014J2200005]
  3. Dongguan Municipal Science and Technology Program [2012108102020]
  4. Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body [31315009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims to explore the dynamic responses and crashing characteristics of double hat shaped tubes made of weave carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP). Experimental investigations were carried out into three different thicknesses and lengths of the composite tubes fabricated by the bladder molding process. Three distinct failure modes, classified as progressive end crushing, mid-length collapse and overlap opening, were observed in the dynamic crushing tests. Unlike continuous splaying fronds observed in the quasi-static tests, dynamic tests exhibited a number of fragment segments in the progressive end crushing mode. It is shown that the ply number was a critical parameter affecting the failure mode and energy absorption capability. The increase in ply number led to increases in the peak load and specific energy absorption (SEA); whereas the tubal length seemed insensitive to energy absorption capability. Compared to the quasi-static cases, the dynamic impact tests resulted in the higher peak load (increased from 46 % to 125 %) and lower SEA (reduced from 21 % to 33 %) for the tested tubes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available