3.8 Proceedings Paper

Realistic Commodity Flow Networks to Assess Vulnerability of Food Systems

Journal

COMPLEX NETWORKS & THEIR APPLICATIONS X, VOL 1
Volume 1015, Issue -, Pages 168-179

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-93409-5_15

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USAID [AID-OAA-L-15-00001]
  2. USDA NIFA [FACT 2019-6702129933]
  3. DTRA [HDTRA1-19-D-0007]
  4. University of Virginia Strategic Investment Fund [SIF160]
  5. NSF [IIS-1633028, CMMI-1745207, OAC-1916805, CCF-1918656, OAC-2027541, IIS-1908530]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the complexity of food systems increases, they become more susceptible to unforeseen events. In order to study the flow of food, a data-driven framework was developed and applied to tomato trade networks in Senegal and Nepal, revealing the vulnerability of agricultural trade to attacks.
As the complexity of our food systems increases, they also become susceptible to unanticipated natural and human-initiated events. Commodity trade networks are a critical component of our food systems in ensuring food availability. We develop a generic data-driven framework to construct realistic agricultural commodity trade networks. Our work is motivated by the need to study food flows in the context of biological invasions. These networks are derived by fusing gridded, administrativelevel, and survey datasets on production, trade, and consumption. Further, they are periodic temporal networks reflecting seasonal variations in production and trade of the crop. We apply this approach to create networks of tomato flow for two regions - Senegal and Nepal. Using statistical methods and network analysis, we gain insights into spatiotemporal dynamics of production and trade. Our results suggest that agricultural systems are increasingly vulnerable to attacks through trade of commodities due to their vicinity to regions of high demand and seasonal variations in production and flows.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available