State-of-the-art literature review methodology: A six-step approach for knowledge synthesis

Introduction Researchers and practitioners rely on literature reviews to synthesize large bodies of knowledge. Many types of literature reviews have been developed, each targeting a specific purpose. However, these syntheses are hampered if the review type's paradigmatic roots, methods, and markers of rigor are only vaguely understood. One literature review type whose methodology has yet to be elucidated is the state-of-the-art (SotA) review. If medical educators are to harness SotA reviews to generate knowledge syntheses, we must understand and articulate the paradigmatic roots of, and methods for, conducting SotA reviews. Methods We reviewed 940 articles published between 2014-2021 labeled as SotA reviews. We (a) identified all SotA methods-related resources, (b) examined the foundational principles and techniques underpinning the reviews, and (c) combined our findings to inductively analyze and articulate the philosophical foundations, process steps, and markers of rigor. Results In the 940 articles reviewed, nearly all manuscripts (98%) lacked citations for how to conduct a SotA review. The term state of the art was used in 4 different ways. Analysis revealed that SotA articles are grounded in relativism and subjectivism. Discussion This article provides a 6-step approach for conducting SotA reviews. SotA reviews offer an interpretive synthesis that describes: This is where we are now. This is how we got here. This is where we could be going. This chronologically rooted narrative synthesis provides a methodology for reviewing large bodies of literature to explore why and how our current knowledge has developed and to offer new research directions.

Automated summary

This article explores the paradigmatic roots and methods of the state-of-the-art reviews and provides a six-step approach for conducting such reviews. State-of-the-art reviews offer a chronological narrative synthesis that describes the current state, the process of development, and potential future directions. It provides researchers with a methodology to review large bodies of literature and explore new research directions.