4.7 Article

The role of imaging radar in cultural heritage: From technologies to applications

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102907

Keywords

Imaging radar; GPR; Cultural heritage; Technical integration; Interdisciplinary

Categories

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA19030502]
  2. Jiangxi Provincial Technology Innovation Guid- ance Program (National Science and Technology Award Reserve Project Cultivation Program) [20212AEI91006]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFE0134400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews the development of imaging radar technology and analyzes its performance and limitations in the field of cultural heritage monitoring and management. It proposes a flexible solution for the integration of imaging radar in cultural heritage through pilot synergy applications in archaeological prospection and cultural heritage diagnosis and conservation.
Imaging radar has been dramatically developed over the past decades enabling a better understanding of cultural heritage from a microwave perspective. Nonetheless, a dedicated survey and analysis of the performance of such technology in cultural heritage monitoring and management is required. In order to fill this gap, we first review the technology advance of imaging radar, including ground penetration radar, ground-based and airborne/sat-ellite radar, in the focused cultural applications to grasp the development trend of these technologies. We then analyse the performance and limitations of imaging radar technologies based on their respective characteristics to facilitate the technology service in practical applications. Finally, we propose a flexible solution of imaging radar in cultural heritage through technical integration with pilot synergy applications in archaeological pro-spection and cultural heritage diagnosis and conservation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available