4.5 Article

Planck 2015 results IV. Low Frequency Instrument beams and window functions

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 594, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525809

Keywords

methods: data analysis; cosmic background radiation; telescopes

Funding

  1. CNES
  2. Italian Space Agency (ASI)
  3. INAF
  4. Academy of Finland [253204, 256265, 257989, 283497]
  5. PRACE-31P project [FP7 RI-312763]
  6. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion through the Plan Nacional del Espacio y Plan Nacional de Astronomia y Astrofisica
  7. Space Agency of the German Aerospace Center (DLR) [50OP0901]
  8. Max Planck Society
  9. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
  10. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  11. ESA
  12. CNRS/INSU-IN2P3-INP (France)
  13. ASI (Italy)
  14. CNR (Italy)
  15. INAF (Italy)
  16. NASA (USA)
  17. STFC (UK)
  18. UKSA (UK)
  19. CSIC (Spain)
  20. MINECO (Spain)
  21. JA (Spain)
  22. RES (Spain)
  23. Tekes (Finland)
  24. AoF (Finland)
  25. CSC (Finland)
  26. DLR (Germany)
  27. MPG (Germany)
  28. CSA (Canada)
  29. DTU Space (Denmark)
  30. SER/SSO (Switzerland)
  31. RCN (Norway)
  32. SFI (Ireland)
  33. FCT/MCTES (Portugal)
  34. ERC (EU)
  35. PRACE (EU)
  36. DoE (USA)
  37. CNRS/INSU-IN2P3-INP
  38. ASI
  39. Academy of Finland (AKA) [253204, 283497, 257989, 256265, 283497, 257989, 256265, 253204] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  40. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000393/1, ST/L000768/1, ST/K002821/1, ST/F010885/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  41. UK Space Agency [ST/N001095/1, ST/H001212/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the characterization of the in-flight beams, the beam window functions, and the associated uncertainties for the Planck Low Frequency Instrument (LFI). The structure of the paper is similar to that presented in the 2013 Planck release; the main differences concern the beam normalization and the delivery of the window functions to be used for polarization analysis. The in-flight assessment of the LFI main beams relies on measurements performed during observations of Jupiter. By stacking data from seven Jupiter transits, the main beam profiles are measured down to -25 dB at 30 and 44 GHz, and down to -30 dB at 70 GHz. It has been confirmed that the agreement between the simulated beams and the measured beams is better than 1% at each LFI frequency band (within the 20 dB contour from the peak, the rms values are 0.1% at 30 and 70 GHz; 0.2% at 44 GHz). Simulated polarized beams are used for the computation of the effective beam window functions. The error budget for the window functions is estimated from both main beam and sidelobe contributions, and accounts for the radiometer band shapes. The total uncertainties in the effective beam window functions are 0.7% and 1% at 30 and 44 GHz, respectively (at l approximate to 600); and 0.5% at 70 GHz (at l approximate to 1000).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available