4.6 Article

Influence of Pig Slurry Application Techniques on Soil CO2, N2O, and NH3 Emissions

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su141711107

Keywords

spreading; injection; GHG emission; NH3 emission; leachate chemistry

Funding

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Budapest, Hungary
  2. Szechenyi Plan Plus program [RRF 2.3.1 21 2022 00008]
  3. Hungarian National Research Fund (OTKA/NKFI) project [OTKA FK-131792]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils can accelerate climate change. This study examines the short-term effects of different pig slurry application techniques on soil greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions under different irrigation amounts. The study finds that there is an increase in emissions after slurry application, but the difference between spreading and injection techniques is not significant. Dry conditions lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions and surface spreading without irrigation leads to significantly higher ammonia emissions. The study concludes that soil conditions at the time of application are more important than the application technique for fertilization.
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural soils can accelerate climate change, therefore, different soil fertilization techniques should be assessed before application to reduce GHG emissions. Pig slurry applications can greatly influence soil carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and ammonia (NH3) emissions of arable fields; thus, it is important to find site-specific techniques to lessen any negative environmental impacts. In this study, we examined the short-term effect of pig slurry application techniques of spreading and injection on soil greenhouse gas and NH3 emissions under different irrigation amounts. We used the dynamic chamber method with in-situ gas analyzers. Our study showed that there were elevated emissions during the first week after slurry application; however, the difference between GHG emissions of spreading and injection treatments were not significant. Elevated GHG emissions (213-338% and 250-594% in the case of CO2 and N2O emissions, respectively) were observed under dry circumstances compared to irrigated treatments, as well as significantly higher NH3 emissions occurred for surface spreading under non-irrigated (dry) circumstances compared to other treatments. There were no statistically significant differences between the soil chemistry of different application techniques. However, pig slurry increased the available nitrogen forms (ammonium- and nitrate-nitrogen), which caused N2O and NH3 peaks regardless of treatment type. Leachate chemistry was more affected by irrigation strategies than application techniques. Our study highlights the importance of soil conditions at the time of application, rather than the application technique for fertilization using pig slurry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available