4.7 Article

Heterogeneous Contrastive Learning: Encoding Spatial Information for Compact Visual Representations

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA
Volume 24, Issue -, Pages 4224-4235

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2021.3115335

Keywords

Feature extraction; Semantics; Head; Contrastive learning; pre-training; spatial information

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB1002202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61822208]
  3. GPU cluster built by MCC Laboratory of Information Science and Technology Institution, USTC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a method called heterogeneous contrastive learning (HCL), which adds spatial information to contrastive learning and improves its accuracy and efficiency in several tasks.
Unsupervised pretraining is of great significance for visual representation. Especially, contrastive learning has achieved great success recently, but existing approaches mostly ignored spatial information which is often crucial for visual representation. Strong semantic embedding has an inherent advantage for classification, but dense prediction tasks require more spatial and low-level representation. This paper presents heterogeneous contrastive learning (HCL), an effective approach that adds spatial information to the encoding stage to alleviate the learning inconsistency between the contrastive objective and strong data augmentation operations. We demonstrate the effectiveness of HCL by showing that (i) it achieves higher accuracy in instance discrimination, (ii) it surpasses existing pre-training methods in a series of downstream tasks (iii) and it shrinks the pre-training costs by half for almost 800 GPU-hours. More importantly, we show that our approach achieves higher efficiency in visual representations, and thus delivers a key message to inspire the future research of self-supervised visual representation learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available