4.7 Article

The feasibility of an online educational lifestyle program for people with multiple sclerosis: A qualitative analysis of participant semi-structured interviews

Journal

DIGITAL HEALTH
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/20552076221123713

Keywords

multiple sclerosis; digital health; intervention; feasibility; randomised controlled trail; lifestyle; qualitative

Funding

  1. Overcoming Multiple Sclerosis Charity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of an online course for multiple sclerosis and found that participants were satisfied with the course's accessibility and comprehensibility.
Objective To explore the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of a multiple sclerosis online course (MSOC) via qualitative analysis of participant semi-structured interviews. Methods The MSOC was developed in two arms: intervention arm which contained evidence-based lifestyle modification recommendations, and standard-care arm which delivered information from MS websites reflecting standard advice. Participants were recruited via online advertisements, completed a baseline questionnaire, and randomised. Seven modules were delivered over six weeks. Course completers were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Within a qualitative paradigm, interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Fourteen of the 17 course completers were interviewed: 86% (12/14) female; mean age 50 years; residing in Australia, New Zealand, and the USA, predominantly had relapsing-remitting MS, mean time from diagnosis 9.5 years, and patient-determined disease steps disability assessment distributed evenly across all three categories. Four themes were identified: 1) Hearing our stories (hope for the future, feeling represented, exploring the journey of others with MS, learning from diversity, and wanting to connect with others); 2) Taking the plunge (not wanting to be first, feelings of nervousness or reluctance and feeling confronted); 3) The accessibility and safety of being online (ease of access, going at your own pace, making it work and not letting others down); and 4) unpacking the course (ease of navigation, visuals, understandability, and length and timing). Conclusion Participants felt represented, found the course accessible and content was easy to understand. These experiences provide important insights and considerations for this digital health intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available