4.5 Article

Differences in temperament and character inventory (TCI) profile between suicidal and nonsuicidal psychiatric outpatients

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 101, Issue 35, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030202

Keywords

character; risk assessments; suicide attempt; temperament

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identifies personality traits associated with suicide attempts, particularly novelty seeking, harm avoidance, and self-directedness. These findings are important for understanding and preventing suicidal behavior.
The purpose of this study was to identify personality traits associated with suicide attempt in a clinical sample. Temperament and character inventory (TCI) profiles of 759 patients who met the inclusion criteria among 1000 randomly selected hospital records collected. Of these 759 patients, 103 had a history of at least 1 actual suicide attempt (suicidal group) whereas 656 had no such history (nonsuicidal group). The suicidal group showed higher scores of novelty seeking (mean +/- SD: 36.1 +/- 1.2 vs 33.3 +/- 0.5; P = .026) and harm avoidance (57.1 +/- 1.5 vs 53.0 +/- 0.6; P = .01) but lower scores of self-directedness (27.5 +/- 1.5 vs 34.4 +/- 0.6; P < .001) than the nonsuicidal group. Higher novelty seeking (OR [95% CI]: 1.031 [1.008-1.054]; P = .007) and lower self-directedness: 0.955 [0.927-0.983]; P = .002 were also associated with suicide attempts in the analysis of 7 personality scales. These findings suggest that patients who attempt suicide differ from nonattempters in terms of personality traits, especially in novelty seeking (NS), harm avoidance (HA), and self-directedness (SD). It is noteworthy that this study contains data from actual visits to the emergency room to evaluate suicide attempts. Abbreviations: CO = cooperativeness, Ha = harm avoidance, NS = novelty seeking, PS = persistence, RD = reward dependence, SD = self-directedness, ST = self-transcendence, TCI = temperament and character inventory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available